This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Putting the interests of patients first"

About: New Stobhill Hospital / Rheumatology

(as the patient),

I have bad arthritic hands and over the past few years I have been having cortisone injections twice a year, for the pain. This year, I seem to not have as severe a problem as usual.

My regular appointment was due. I thought it not ethical to take up an appointment or have a treatment that I did not genuinely need. My plan was to contact appointments or the surgeon, suggest that someone else should have that appointment, and that I could perhaps fit in in 3 months time or so when I expected I would really need it.

I started off contacting the consultant’s secretary, explained my thinking and asked if she could facilitate that. I pointed out that I did not want to do a straightforward cancellation whereby I would finish up at the bottom of the waiting list, some 7 months or so away. She understood, agreed that that was sensible, but said that I should contact appointments.

For the next two days I tried frequently to contact appointments with no success. I also made 2 more calls to the secretary and also tried other numbers on the hospital site. A number of different personnel also tried to connect me to appointments with no success.

Eventually, the medical secretary sent them an e-mail asking them to contact me, which they eventually did. I explained the situation again and my thinking. However, there was no way that they would cooperate. If I wanted to postpone my appointment, I would have to go to the end of the list. They left me no choice, but to keep my appointment.

After discussion with my family I decided to do that, against my judgement, but I decided to not have any injections but to discuss with the consultant the possibility of going private, having the injections when I needed them, not within a rigid NHS system, not when it suited them and the appointment system.

This I did. The registrar whom I saw was really understanding, saw no need to go private and immediately offered to change my appointment himself. There and then he did what I wanted, set up an appointment a reasonable time ahead, when I would be likely to be in need of it. Common sense.

However, I had to take up an appointment to get that to happen, I had to deprive someone else of seeing the consultant sooner, when perhaps they really needed it. A waste of my time and the NHS time, not to mention the fact that it took me hours on the phone beforehand. I know that the appointments staff need to have a system, but surely there has to be some kind of leeway to suit patient needs.

I imagine that if I find myself in that situation again that the outcome will be precisely the same.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Nicole McInally, Patient Experience and Public Involvement Project Manager, PEPI, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde 6 months ago
Nicole McInally
Patient Experience and Public Involvement Project Manager, PEPI,
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Submitted on 25/10/2023 at 09:37
Published on Care Opinion at 09:37


picture of Nicole McInally

Dear Laggan

Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I am sorry to hear about the issues you experienced regarding the rescheduling your appointment and for the time and effort this took. I am glad that the registrar was able to re-arrange your appointment and avoid you having to go private. I have shared your feedback with the Rheumatology and Health Records. Would you mind contacting us with your personal details (name and date of birth) so that we can look into this further and avoid this happening again? Can you please email PatientExperience@ggc.scot.nhs.uk and if possible could you include your Care Opinion username?

Many thanks

Nicole

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k